The Myth of ‘Saffron Terror’ Busted: Shocking Testimony from Muslim ATS Officer Exposes Deep-State Plot

In what can only be described as a seismic shift in India’s national security narrative, a former Muslim ATS (Anti-Terrorism Squad) officer, Mahboob Mujawar, has made a stunning statement that has exploded the long-standing narrative of so-called ‘Saffron Terror’. His admission, revealed after a decade of silence, suggests that the entire narrative might have been artificially crafted to politically target Hindu organizations and leaders like Mohan Bhagwatand Yogi Adityanath.

This revelation comes on the heels of the NIA court’s acquittal of all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, further dismantling the already fragile foundations of the ‘Saffron Terror’ narrative coined during the UPA regime.

This blog will break down the timeline, players, testimony, and implications of this shocking disclosure, using CBS-style deep investigation and clarity.

The Origin of ‘Saffron Terror’ – A Political Coinage

The term ‘Saffron Terror’ was first used during the tenure of Home Minister P. Chidambaram under the UPA government. It was introduced as a label to shift the national conversation away from Islamic terrorism to alleged Hindu radicalism. High-profile cases such as Malegaon 2006 & 2008, Samjhauta Express, and Ajmer Sharif blastswere cited.

However, most of these cases ended in acquittals or are still stuck in legal limbo, with investigative lapses and alleged fabrication of evidence.

Who is Mahboob Mujawar?

Mahboob Mujawar was a former ATS officer with the Maharashtra Police. As part of the Malegaon investigation team, he was entrusted with field operations and intelligence gathering.

In his explosive testimony, Mujawar claims:

• He was instructed by senior officers (including Paramveer Singh and unnamed top officials) to frame RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat.
• He was provided with official funds, revolvers, staff, and warrants to carry out the operation.
• He was told to abduct Mohan Bhagwat from Nagpur and bring him to Mumbai.
• When he refused to execute the order, he was falsely charged and jailed.
• After ten years, he was acquitted, and his affidavit with these claims was submitted to the court well before the NIA verdict.

Malegaon Blast Case: Who Were the Accused?

The 2008 Malegaon blast accused included:

• Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur (now BJP MP)
• Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit
• Major Ramesh Upadhyay
• Ajay Rahirkar
• Sudhakar Chaturvedi
• Sudhakar Trivedi
• Sameer Kulkarni

All seven were acquitted by the NIA court after 15 years of legal battle, citing lack of evidence and faulty investigations.

ATS vs NIA: Institutional Politics?

This case reflects a pattern of deep institutional bias and potential misuse of investigative agencies. While the ATS pursued a narrative of ‘Hindu Terror’, the NIA’s findings differed drastically, ultimately acquitting the accused.

Mujawar’s statement highlights the possibility of systemic abuse of authority, driven by political motivation rather than truth.

Alleged Targeting of Mohan Bhagwat and Yogi Adityanath

Perhaps the most sensational part of the testimony was the mention of a plot to frame Mohan Bhagwat, and coerce witnesses to name Yogi Adityanath.

These were not casual accusations. Mujawar submitted an affidavit in court, and his claims match some key timelines during the investigation phase. According to him:

“Had I complied, I would’ve destroyed an innocent man’s life and broken my own soul.”

He was imprisoned, harassed, and labelled for refusing a “fake terror assignment.”

The Collapse of the ‘Saffron Terror’ Argument

The narrative collapsed not just because of Mujawar’s testimony, but because of:

• Multiple acquittals in Malegaon and other so-called ‘Saffron Terror’ cases.
• Inconsistent chargesheets.
• Witnesses turning hostile or revealing coercion.
• Lack of forensic or material evidence.

This isn’t just about legal failure—it’s about moral accountability.

Media’s Role: From Loud Headlines to Silent Retraction

When the term ‘Saffron Terror’ first surfaced, it dominated headlines. Media trials painted accused individuals as guilty even before investigations concluded.

Yet today, as courts exonerate the same individuals, the media silence is deafening. Mujawar’s shocking statements should have been prime-time breaking news, but were instead buried in YouTube corners and alt-media platforms.

Implications for Indian Democracy

This revelation has implications far beyond a single case. It raises serious questions:

• Can investigative agencies remain impartial under political pressure?
• Are there safeguards to prevent political misuse of law enforcement?
• How many lives were destroyed to construct a fake narrative?

If institutions like ATS can be allegedly used to execute political vendettas, then democracy and rule of law suffer.

What Now? Time for Institutional Reform

1. Independent Audits: Past terror investigations should be reviewed by independent judicial panels.
2. Apology to the Innocent: Those acquitted deserve formal apologies and compensation.
3. Media Accountability: Channels that ran false campaigns must retract and acknowledge errors.
4. Legal Safeguards: Stronger oversight mechanisms are needed to prevent political misuse of investigative agencies.

Conclusion: Truth Always Finds a Way

For 15 years, a myth was built, backed by political narrative, media echo chambers, and institutional abuse. That myth has now been shattered—not by a Hindu right-wing spokesperson, but by a Muslim officer who refused to lie.

Mahboob Mujawar’s testimony isn’t just a statement; it’s a confession of conscience—a light cutting through years of darkness. His words now stand as a historical record against a dark chapter in India’s democratic journey.

It’s time India asks tough questions, rewrites the wrongs, and restores the dignity of truth.

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

(For more deep-dive stories, follow the KootNeeti series under Guruji Ka Tandav)