In an explosive and deeply engaging discussion on YouTube, veteran journalists Dhirendra Pundir and Omkar Chaudhary appeared on Sanjay Dixit’s platform to discuss one of the most heated constitutional and political debates in recent history — the growing tension between the Indian Judiciary and the Union Government, particularly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership. The video titled “Modi’s Masterstroke Against Supreme Court? | Infighting in Judiciary” has sparked national introspection.
Backdrop: The Sparks That Ignited the Fire
The current crisis escalated when BJP MP Nishikant Dubey made an explosive comment that the Chief Justice of India is trying to incite civil war in the country. This comment, though controversial, did not appear in isolation. It followed weeks of public statements and constitutional actions taken by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, former UP Deputy CM Dinesh Sharma, and legal luminary Manan Mishra, all questioning the overreach of the Supreme Court in matters reserved for Parliament and the Executive.
- The Supreme Court recently directed the President regarding state bills.
- Observations were made on the Hindu Endowment Boards.
- Past decisions like interim stays on the farm laws, and judicial overreach in policy matters, added to the perception.
Why is Nishikant Dubey Important?
- Nishikant Dubey is not a product of the 2014 Modi wave. He won his first election in 2009 under LK Advani’s leadership when BJP was in decline.
- Known for rigorous research, parliamentary procedural command, and fierce loyalty, Dubey is often chosen by the BJP to speak on critical issues in Parliament.
- He is recognized as a strong voice against the Gandhi family and an articulate spokesperson in Parliament.
Vice President Dhankhar’s Role
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar was the first to raise fundamental questions:
- Can the Supreme Court direct constitutional heads like the President and Governors?
- On what authority does the SC investigate corruption or allegations against its own judges through internal committees without FIRs?
He posed that the Judiciary is becoming a “super Parliament,” taking liberties not granted by the Constitution.
Supreme Court’s Selective Outrage
Multiple cases have surfaced where judicial action or inaction has raised eyebrows:
- Fast suo motu action in Manipur vs complete silence on West Bengal post-poll violence.
- Quick bail to Congress leaders like Pawan Khera within hours, but no hearing on long-pending public interest litigations.
- Courts imposing penalties on PILs questioning unconstitutional religious favoritism.
Waqf Amendment Act and the Hindu Sentiment
The recent Waqf Amendment Act became a flashpoint:
- Supreme Court’s questioning of Hindu trusts’ openness to non-Hindus was seen as biased.
- Historical grievances resurfaced: the Supreme Court never intervened in temple land encroachments or mosque conversions over temple ruins.
- The 2015 judicial reform bill, judicial accountability, and Hindu temple autonomy have been sidelined for years.
Social Media and Public Sentiment
- Unlike earlier decades, today, the public has access to information.
- Social media acts as a court of public opinion, holding even judges accountable.
- People are questioning why judges with alleged corruption are protected.
- Historical inaction by the judiciary is being contrasted against current judicial hyperactivity.
Double Standards and Political Manipulation
- Kapil Sibal and other ecosystem lawyers are seen weaponizing the judiciary by selectively appearing in political cases.
- Same faces, same narratives, creating an impression of judiciary capture.
- Allegations that Supreme Court benches are influenced to create instability or delay key reforms.
The Deeper Crisis: Disconnect from Indian Civilizational Ethos
A sharp critique came regarding judges’ alienation from India’s culture:
- Judges who do not understand Indian languages or traditions are passing judgments affecting centuries-old systems.
- Demand that judges undergo at least a year of Gurukul or traditional Indian civilizational studies.
The Rahul Gandhi Angle and Opposition’s Role
- Rahul Gandhi’s foreign visits and speeches raise questions: in what capacity is he meeting businessmen or addressing universities?
- Opposition leaders are accused of faking narratives abroad while having no electoral strength domestically.
Farm Laws, Protest Manipulation, and Judiciary’s Role
- Farm laws, despite being beneficial as per an independent committee’s report, were stayed due to pressure.
- A similar strategy is being used now to stall the Waqf Amendment Act through orchestrated public outrage and litigation.
Conclusion: Modi’s Silent Masterstroke?
The government’s restrained but calculated support to figures like Dhankhar, Dubey, and Sharma signals a silent but firm assertion of the Parliament’s supremacy.
- BJP leadership is believed to be aware of the long game.
- Modi and Shah are likely playing a strategy to eventually force a constitutional and judicial reset.
- The demand is not to disrespect courts but to ensure their alignment with Bharat’s democratic and cultural values.
What Lies Ahead?
The judiciary vs legislature confrontation is not a short-term battle. It is a deeper civilizational clash about who gets to define Bharat’s future. With social media, nationalist awareness, and public pressure mounting, the days of unchecked judicial overreach may be numbered.
जय भारत! जय सनातन! वंदे मातरम्!
– Guruji Sunil Chaudhary
Founder – Career Building School (formerly TAMS Studies) & JustBaazaar
